Engaging Mobile Population Vulnerabilities
How Can Disaster Workers Better Engage in Reducing Disaster Vulnerability of Mobile Populations?
Working to reduce the disaster vulnerability of mobile populations is a complex process that requires an understanding of various factors that contribute to people’s vulnerability. A vital part of this process is to recognize the unique challenges that mobile populations face and to develop strategies that consider the specific needs of these populations (Hoffmann & Blecha, 2020). This includes understanding the different access to resources and services, the prevalence of informal settlements, and the social structures that influence their vulnerability.
To better engage on this topic, disaster workers must build relationships and partnerships with the mobile populations they work with. This requires taking the time to learn about the cultures and traditions of these populations and working in collaboration with them to develop solutions (Hoffmann & Blecha, 2020). This means engaging in dialogue with them to understand better their needs and concerns and developing strategies tailored to their particular context. Additionally, disaster workers should work to build capacity and support within these communities to empower them to take part in the disaster management process. This could include developing training programs, providing technical assistance, or creating platforms for community members to share their stories and experiences.
Finally, disaster workers should strive to engage in research and data collection to understand mobile populations’ challenges better. This means collecting data on the factors contributing to their vulnerability and identifying potential solutions and strategies to implement. Research can also help to inform disaster workers on how to craft the best messaging and communication that resonates with the phone population they are working with and helps to build mutual understanding and trust. By engaging in research and data collection, disaster workers can better understand the context in which they are working and develop more effective strategies to reduce disaster vulnerability.
What does this mean for the issue of mobile populations?
Preparedness and mitigation are essential aspects of disaster management, especially when it comes to mobile populations. Preparedness and mitigation are necessary because they allow us to anticipate, plan for, and reduce the impacts of disasters before they occur. This includes developing strategies to mitigate the vulnerability of mobile populations, such as developing evacuation plans, providing access to resources and services, and creating risk communication plans (Das, 2018).
Preparedness and mitigation mean educating and training mobile populations on preparing for disasters and developing plans tailored to their context and needs (Das, 2018). This could include developing evacuation plans that consider the unique circumstances of mobile populations, providing access to resources and services, and creating risk communication plans tailored to their specific languages and cultures. Preparedness and mitigation also mean building capacity and resilience within these communities to anticipate, plan for, and respond to disasters more effectively.
Preparedness and mitigation also mean engaging in research and data collection to understand better the challenges that mobile populations face. This includes collecting data on the factors contributing to their vulnerability and identifying potential strategies and solutions to be implemented (Paton, 2018). Research can also help to inform disaster workers on how to best craft messaging and communication that resonates with the mobile population they are working with and helps to build mutual understanding and trust. By engaging in research and data collection, disaster workers can better understand the context in which they are working and develop more effective strategies to reduce disaster vulnerability.
References
Carlberg, M., & Hardell, L. (2017). Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9218486
Das, R. (2018). Disaster preparedness for better response: Logistics perspectives. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.005
Gschwender, A. N., & Gillard, L. (2017). Disaster preparedness in the blood bank. American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science, 30(4), 250-257.
Hoffmann, R., & Blecha, D. (2020). Education and Disaster Vulnerability in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Policy Implications. Sustainability, 12(4), 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041401
Labrague, L. J., Hammad, K., Gloe, D. S., McEnroe‐Petitte, D. M., Fronda, D. C., Obeidat, A. A., … Mirafuentes, E. C. (2017). Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. International Nursing Review, 65(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12369
Liu, W., Dugar, S., McCallum, I., Thapa, G., See, L., Khadka, P., … Shakya, P. (2018). Integrated Participatory and Collaborative Risk Mapping for Enhancing Disaster Resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7020068
Paton, D. (2018). Disaster risk reduction: Psychological perspectives on preparedness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12237
Paul, J. D., Bee, E., & Budimir, M. (2021). Mobile phone technologies for disaster risk reduction. Climate Risk Management, 32, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100296
Rañeses, M. K., Chang-Richards, A., Richards, J., & Bubb, J. (2018). Measuring the level of disaster preparedness in Auckland. Procedia Engineering, 212, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.054
Rao, L. M., Mohan, J. R., AppaRao, A. P. V., Kumar, A. R. S., & Rao, P. R. R. C. K. (2017). Disaster management: prevention, mitigation & preparedness. Int J Multidisciplinary Edu Res, 6(4), 206-231.